1). The moral will arises when, for the reasons we saw earlier, this negation has to be negated; the individual moral will understands that it is the existence of the universal will, which is therefore internal to it. 2). This constitutes a negation, the individual will is understood not to be the existence of the universal will. 3). This says that in abstract right, as we have just seen, the individual will takes its freedom (the universal will that has being in itself) to exist independent f (that is, in opposition to) itself and its particular contents. 4). Rather, the universal will is thought to exist outside any individual will, in the contracts that bind a number of property-owing wills together, and in the punishments that enforce breaches of those contracts.
Answer: B 3 introduces the idea, making it the obvious opener. The pronoun 'this' in 2 refers to the idea in 3, making 3-2 the mandatory pair. 4 takes the idea forward and 1 concludes the idea, making 3,2,4,1 as the correct sequence.
Q. No. 44:
1). In the concept, universality, particularity, and individuality are understood as being immediately identical to each other. 2). As immediately identical, these “moments of the concept” cannot be separated. 3). This means that they must be thought of as a single unity, that none of thee can be understood apart from the others, since in the concept their identity is posited, each of its moments can only be grasped immediately on the basis of and together with the others. 4). The interrelation of universality, particularity, and individuality is otherwise in judgement.
Answer: A Statement 1 is the obvious opener. In 2 the word 'these' relate to the concepts mentioned in 1. 3 is a conclusion made by the author from 1 and 2. 4 makes an exception to 3. Thus the correct sequence is 1,2,3,4.